Publication:
Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage8688
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue34
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalJournal of Clinical Oncology
dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage8696
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume23
dc.contributor.authorRodel, C.
dc.contributor.authorMartus, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPapadoupolos, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFuzesi, Laszlo
dc.contributor.authorKlimpfinger, M.
dc.contributor.authorFietkau, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorLiersch, Thorsten
dc.contributor.authorHohenberger, Werner
dc.contributor.authorRaab, Hans-Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorSauer, R.
dc.contributor.authorWittekind, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T10:53:54Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T10:53:54Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractPurpose We assessed the impact of tumor regression grading (TRG) and its value in correlation to established prognostic factors in a cohort of rectal carcinoma patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients and Methods TRG was evaluated on surgical specimens of 385 patients treated within the preoperative CRT arm of the CAO/ARC/AlC-94 trial: 50.4 Gy was delivered, fluorouracil was given in the first and fifth week, and surgery was performed 6 weeks thereafter. TRG was determined by the amount of viable tumor versus fibrosis, ranging from TRG 4 when no viable tumor cells were detected, to TRG 0 when fibrosis was completely absent. TRG 3 was defined as regression more than 50% with fibrosis outgrowing the tumor mass, TRG 2 was defined as regression less than 50%, and TRG 1 was defined basically as a morphologically unaltered tumor mass. We performed an initially unplanned, hypothesis-generating analysis with respect to the prognostic value of this TRG system. Results TRG 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 was found in 10.4%, 52.2%, 13.8%, 15.3%, and 8.3% of the resected specimens, respectively. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) after CRT and curative resection was 86% for TRG 4, 75% for grouped TRG 2 + 3, and 63% for grouped TRG 0 + 1 (P = .006). On multivariate analysis, the pathologic T category and the nodal status after CRT were the most important independent prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusion In this exploratory analysis, complete (TRG 4) and intermediate pathologic response (TRG 2 + 3) suggested improved DFS after preoperative CRT. TRG assessment should be implemented in pathologic evaluation and prospectively validated in further studies.
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1329
dc.identifier.isi000233690200021
dc.identifier.pmid16246976
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/49451
dc.notes.statuszu prüfen
dc.notes.submitterNajko
dc.publisherAmer Soc Clinical Oncology
dc.publisher.placeAlexandria
dc.relation.conference41st Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology
dc.relation.eventlocationOrlando, FL
dc.relation.issn0732-183X
dc.titlePrognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
dc.typeconference_paper
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.peerReviewedyes
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections