Publication:
Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants

dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber175
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue1
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalAlzheimer's Research & Therapy
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorDubois, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorvon Arnim, Christine A. F.
dc.contributor.authorBurnie, Nerida
dc.contributor.authorBozeat, Sasha
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T07:38:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T07:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-13
dc.date.updated2023-10-15T03:11:15Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Development of in vivo biomarkers has shifted the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from the later dementia stages of disease towards the earlier stages and has introduced the potential for pre-symptomatic diagnosis. The International Working Group recommends that AD diagnosis is restricted in the clinical setting to people with specific AD phenotypes and supportive biomarker findings. Main body In this review, we discuss the phenotypic presentation and use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of typical and atypical AD and describe how this can support clinical decision making, benefit patient communication, and improve the patient journey. Early diagnosis is essential to optimize the benefits of available and emerging treatments. As atypical presentations of AD often mimic other dementias, differential diagnosis can be challenging and can be facilitated using AD biomarkers. However, AD biomarkers alone are not sufficient to confidently diagnose AD or predict disease progression and should be supplementary to clinical assessment to help inform the diagnosis of AD. Conclusions Use of AD biomarkers with incorporation of atypical AD phenotypes into diagnostic criteria will allow earlier diagnosis of patients with atypical clinical presentations that otherwise would have been misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately. Early diagnosis is essential to guide informed discussion, appropriate care and support, and individualized treatment. It is hoped that disease-modifying treatments will impact the underlying AD pathology; thus, determining the patient’s AD phenotype will be a critical factor in guiding the therapeutic approach and the assessment of the effects of interventions.
dc.identifier.citationAlzheimer's Research & Therapy. 2023 Oct 13;15(1):175
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/138516
dc.item.fulltextWith Fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.holderBioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s disease
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectBlood-based biomarkers
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluid
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectMild cognitive impairment
dc.subjectPhenotype
dc.subjectPositron emission tomography
dc.subjectProdromal stage
dc.titleBiomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.versionpublished_version
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13195_2023_Article_1314.pdf
Size:
1.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections