Publication:
Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy

dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpageE99
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue02
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalEndoscopy International Open
dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpageE104
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume08
dc.contributor.authorKnoop, Richard F.
dc.contributor.authorWedi, Edris
dc.contributor.authorPetzold, Golo
dc.contributor.authorBremer, Sebastian C.B.
dc.contributor.authorAmanzada, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorEllenrieder, Volker
dc.contributor.authorNeesse, Albrecht
dc.contributor.authorKunsch, Steffen
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T10:50:56Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T10:50:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background and study aims Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered.
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/a-0996-8050
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/86831
dc.item.fulltextWith Fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.notes.internDOI-Import GROB-425
dc.relation.eissn2196-9736
dc.relation.issn2364-3722
dc.titleEndoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
document.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections