Publication:
Neurophysiology: Hodgkin and Huxley model — still standing? (Reply)

dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpageE2
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue7123
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalNature
dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpageE3
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume445
dc.contributor.authorNaundorf, Björn
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Fred
dc.contributor.authorVolgushev, Maxim
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-07T11:46:15Z
dc.date.available2017-09-07T11:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractMcCormick et al.1 question whether the rapid onset and highly variable thresholds of action potentials2 are genuine features of cortical action-potential generators — that is, whether they reflect the voltage-dependence of the underlying sodium currents. Instead, they consider these features to be epiphenomena, reflecting lateral currents from a remote initiation site, and, contrary to direct evidence3, they assume that sodium currents show canonical kinetics.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/nature05534
dc.identifier.gro3151871
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8702
dc.language.isoen
dc.notes.statusfinal
dc.notes.submitterchake
dc.relation.issn0028-0836
dc.titleNeurophysiology: Hodgkin and Huxley model — still standing? (Reply)
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.peerReviewedno
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections