Publication:
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for teenage school students in England and Scotland. A mixed methods assessment

dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber487
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalBMC Public Health
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Aileen
dc.contributor.authorFriede, Tim
dc.contributor.authorPutz, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorAshdown, Jacquie
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Steven
dc.contributor.authorBlake, Amy
dc.contributor.authorAdi, Yaser
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, Jane
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorPlatt, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorStewart-Brown, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T08:54:59Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T08:54:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding and measuring mental health and wellbeing amongst teenagers has recently become a priority. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) is validated for measuring mental wellbeing in populations aged 16 years and over in the UK. We report here a study designed to establish the validity and reliability of WEMWBS in teenagers in the UK. Methods: WEMWBS and comparator scales, together with socio-demographic information and self-reported health, were incorporated into a self-administered questionnaire given to pupils aged 13 to 16 years in six schools in Scotland and England. Psychometric properties including internal consistency, correlations with comparator scales, test-retest stability and unidimensionality were investigated for WEMWBS. Twelve focus groups were undertaken to assess acceptability and comprehensibility of WEMWBS and were taped, transcribed and analysed thematically. Results: A total of 1,650 teenagers completed the questionnaire (response rate 80.8%). Mean WEMWBS score was 48.8 (SD 6.8; median 49). Response scores covered the full range (from 14 to 70). WEMWBS demonstrated strong internal consistency and a high Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 (95% CI (0.85-0.88), n = 1517). Measures of construct validity gave values as predicted. The correlation coefficient for WEMWBS total score and psychological wellbeing domain of the Kidscreen-27 was 0.59 (95% CI [0.55; 0.62]); for the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) was 0.65, 95% CI [0.62; 0.69]; and for the WHO (WHO-5) Well-being Index 0.57 (95% CI [0.53; 0.61]). The correlation coefficient for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was -0.44 (95% CI [-0.49; -0.40]) and for the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12) -0.45 (95% CI [-0.49; -0.40]). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.66 (95% CI [0.59; 0.72] n = 212)). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated one underlying factor. WEMWBS was significantly associated with the Family Affluence Score (WEMWBS increased with increasing household socio-economic status) and had a positive association with the physical health dimension of the Kidscreen-27, but was unrelated to age, gender or location/school. Eighty students took part in focus groups. In general, although some students considered some items open to misunderstanding or misinterpretation, WEMWBS was received positively and was considered comprehensible, and acceptable. Conclusions: WEMWBS is a psychometrically strong population measure of mental wellbeing, and can be used for this purpose in teenagers aged 13 and over.
dc.description.sponsorshipNHS Health Scotland
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-11-487
dc.identifier.isi000292865100002
dc.identifier.pmid21693055
dc.identifier.purlhttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6836
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22800
dc.item.fulltextWith Fulltext
dc.notes.internMerged from goescholar
dc.notes.statuszu prüfen
dc.notes.submitterNajko
dc.publisherBiomed Central Ltd
dc.relation.issn1471-2458
dc.rightsCC BY 2.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
dc.titleWarwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for teenage school students in England and Scotland. A mixed methods assessment
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.peerReviewedyes
dc.type.statuspublished
dc.type.versionpublished_version
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1471-2458-11-487.pdf
Size:
307.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections