Publication:
Test-retest reliability of a new questionnaire for the retrospective assessment of long-term lithium use in bipolar disorder

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2015

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science Bv

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background: The identification of predictors of treatment response holds tremendous potential for the improvement of clinical outcomes in bipolar disorder (BP). The goal of this project is to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a new clinical tool, the Lithium Questionnaire (LQ), for the retrospective assessment of long-term lithium use in research participants with BP. Methods: Twenty-nine individuals with BP-I (n=27), major depression (n=1), or schizoaffective disorder (n=1) were recruited for participation. The LQ was administered to all participants at two time-points, spaced 17 months apart on average, and used to determine each subject's score on the Retrospective Criteria of Long Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder Scale, or the Alda Scale. Scores were confirmed through a best estimate procedure, and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) of the LQ was calculated. Results: The correlation between the total Alda Scale scores at the two time points was in the moderate range (ICC=0.60). Relevant clinical factors such as age or presence of Axis I psychiatric comorbidity did not influence the reliability. Limitations: The validity of the LQ was not examined. Inclusion of two participants with non BP diagnoses may have affected the LQ's reliability, but re-analysis of our data after exclusion of these participants did not influence the reliability. The absence of measures of mood and cognition at time of LQ may be a limitation of this work. Conclusions: The LQ holds promise for the standardization of the retrospective assessment of long-term treatment in BP. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By