Publication:
Basin structure of optimization based state and parameter estimation

dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber053108
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue5
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume25
dc.contributor.authorSchumann-Bischoff, Jan
dc.contributor.authorParlitz, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorAbarbanel, Henry D. I.
dc.contributor.authorKostuk, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRey, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorEldridge, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLuther, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T09:57:31Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T09:57:31Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractMost data based state and parameter estimation methods require suitable initial values or guesses to achieve convergence to the desired solution, which typically is a global minimum of some cost function. Unfortunately, however, other stable solutions (e.g., local minima) may exist and provide suboptimal or even wrong estimates. Here, we demonstrate for a 9-dimensional Lorenz-96 model how to characterize the basin size of the global minimum when applying some particular optimization based estimation algorithm. We compare three different strategies for generating suitable initial guesses, and we investigate the dependence of the solution on the given trajectory segment (underlying the measured time series). To address the question of how many state variables have to be measured for optimal performance, different types of multivariate time series are considered consisting of 1, 2, or 3 variables. Based on these time series, the local observability of state variables and parameters of the Lorenz-96 model is investigated and confirmed using delay coordinates. This result is in good agreement with the observation that correct state and parameter estimation results are obtained if the optimization algorithm is initialized with initial guesses close to the true solution. In contrast, initialization with other exact solutions of the model equations (different from the true solution used to generate the time series) typically fails, i.e., the optimization procedure ends up in local minima different from the true solution. Initialization using random values in a box around the attractor exhibits success rates depending on the number of observables and the available time series (trajectory segment). (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.4920942
dc.identifier.isi000355917000008
dc.identifier.pmid26026320
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37176
dc.notes.statuszu prüfen
dc.notes.submitterNajko
dc.relationSFB 1002: Modulatorische Einheiten bei Herzinsuffizienz
dc.relationSFB 1002 | C03: Erholung nach Herzinsuffizienz: Analyse der transmuralen mechano-elektrischen Funktionsstörung
dc.relation.issn1089-7682
dc.relation.issn1054-1500
dc.relation.urlhttps://sfb1002.med.uni-goettingen.de/production/literature/publications/85
dc.relation.workinggroupRG Luther (Biomedical Physics)
dc.titleBasin structure of optimization based state and parameter estimation
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.peerReviewedyes
dc.type.subtypeoriginal_ja
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections