Publication:
Testing a Motor Score Based on PANSS Ratings: A Proxy for Comprehensive Motor Assessment

dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumbersbae153
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalSchizophrenia Bulletin
dc.contributor.authorNadesalingam, Niluja
dc.contributor.authorKyrou, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorChapellier, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorMaderthaner, Lydia
dc.contributor.authorvon Känel, Sofie
dc.contributor.authorWüthrich, Florian
dc.contributor.authorNuoffer, Melanie G
dc.contributor.authorLefebvre, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorPavlidou, Anastasia
dc.contributor.authorWobrock, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T22:13:32Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T22:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background and Hypothesis Abnormal psychomotor behavior is a core schizophrenia symptom. However, assessment of motor abnormalities with expert rating scales is challenging. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) includes 3 items broadly related to hypokinetic motor behavior. Here, we tested whether a sum score of the PANSS items mannerisms and posturing (G5), motor retardation (G7), and disturbance of volition (G13) corresponds to expert ratings, potentially qualifying as a proxy-marker of motor abnormalities. Study Design Combining baseline datasets (n = 196) of 2 clinical trials (OCoPS-P, BrAGG-SoS), we correlated PANSS motor score (PANSSmot) and 5 motor rating scales. In addition, we tested whether the cutoff set at ≥3 on each PANSS motor item, ie, “mild” on G05, G07, and G13 (in total ≥9 on PANSSmot) would differentiate the patients into groups with high vs low scores in motor scales. We further sought for replication in an independent trial (RESIS, n = 102), tested the longitudinal stability using week 3 data of OCoPS-P (n = 75), and evaluated the validity of PANSSmot with instrumental measures of physical activity (n = 113). Study Results PANSSmot correlated with all motor scales (Spearman-Rho-range 0.19–0.52, all P ≤ .007). Furthermore, the cutoff set at ≥3 on each PANSS motor item was able to distinguish patients with high vs low motor scores in all motor scales except using Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (Mann-Whitney-U-Tests: all U ≥ 580, P ≤ .017). Conclusions Our findings suggest that PANSSmot could be a proxy measure for hypokinetic motor abnormalities. This might help to combine large datasets from clinical trials to explore whether some interventions may hold promise to alleviate hypokinetic motor abnormalities in psychosis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/schbul/sbae153
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/145843
dc.item.fulltextNo Fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.notes.internDOI-Import GROB-750
dc.relation.eissn1745-1701
dc.relation.issn0586-7614
dc.titleTesting a Motor Score Based on PANSS Ratings: A Proxy for Comprehensive Motor Assessment
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections