Publication:
Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures

dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage318
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue3
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage324
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume126
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, B. W.
dc.contributor.authorRottwinkel, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T10:45:41Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T10:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractThis longitudinal and prospective clinical study determined the decalcification rate during multibracket treatment (mean duration, 22 months) in 80 randomized, selected adolescents divided into 4 groups of 20 patients each. The study had 2 objectives. The first was to establish whether patient selection based on predefined caries risk indicators, ie, plaque index, approximal plaque index, D3-4MFT/d(3-4)mft index, initial lesions, and gingiva index, carried out before the start of treatment allows for valid predictions of the decalcification risk associated with multibracket treatment. The second objective was to determine whether an extended prophylaxis regimen, including regular mechanical tooth cleaning by a hygienist, scaling, and chlorhexidine treatment, as an adjunct to an initial prophylaxis introductory program consisting of patient motivation, oral hygiene checkups, and fluoridation, reduces or prevents decalcification more effectively than initial prophylaxis alone. The results showed that patient selection based on caries risk factors provides a simple and effective method for predicting the decalcification risk in multibracket treatment (P less than or equal to .001). The tests showed a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 88%, thereby proving the clinical validity of the results. Although extended prophylaxis significantly reduced the decalcification frequency in the risk group (P less than or equal to .05) compared with the control group, decalcification frequency did not reach the low rate found in the low-risk group (P less than or equal to .05).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.031
dc.identifier.isi000223899900024
dc.identifier.pmid15356495
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47559
dc.notes.statuszu prüfen
dc.notes.submitterNajko
dc.publisherMosby, Inc
dc.relation.issn0889-5406
dc.titleAssessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.peerReviewedyes
dc.type.statuspublished
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections