Publication:
Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research

dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber90
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue1
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume19
dc.contributor.authorBeier, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorSchweda, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSchicktanz, Silke
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T11:51:13Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T11:51:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground Data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare such as health-related big data research (HBDR) implies that data from clinical routine, research and patient-reported data, but also non-medical social or demographic data, are aggregated and linked in order to optimize biomedical research. In this context, notions of patient participation and involvement are frequently invoked to legitimize this kind of research and improve its governance. The aim of this debate paper is to critically examine the specific use and ethical role of participatory concepts in the context of HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare. Discussion We introduce basic conceptual distinctions for the understanding of participation by looking at relevant fields of application in politics, bioethics and medical research. Against this backdrop, we identify three paradigmatic participatory roles that patients/subjects are assigned within the field of HBDR: participants as providers of biomaterials and data, participants as administrators of their own research participation and participants as (co-)principal investigators. We further illustrate these roles by exemplary data-intensive research-initiatives. Our analysis of these initiatives and their respective participatory promises reveals specific ethical and practical shortcomings and challenges. Central problems affecting, amongst others, ethical and methodological research standards, as well as public trust in research, result from the negligence of essential political-ethical dimensions of genuine participation. Conclusions Based on the conceptual distinctions introduced, we formulate basic criteria for justified appeals to participatory approaches in HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare in order to overcome these shortcomings. As we suggest, this is not only a matter of conceptual clarity, but a crucial requirement for maintaining ethical standards and trust in HBDR and related medical research.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7
dc.identifier.pmid31023321
dc.identifier.purlhttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16075
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59899
dc.item.fulltextWith Fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.notes.internMerged from goescholar
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleTaking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.versionpublished_version
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12911_2019_Article_799.pdf
Size:
645.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections