Publication:
Adding Some Green to the Greening: Improving the EU's Ecological Focus Areas for Biodiversity and Farmers

dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage517
dc.bibliographiccitation.issue5
dc.bibliographiccitation.journalConservation Letters
dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage530
dc.bibliographiccitation.volume10
dc.contributor.authorPe’er, Guy
dc.contributor.authorZinngrebe, Yves
dc.contributor.authorHauck, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorDittrich, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorZingg, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorTscharntke, Teja
dc.contributor.authorOppermann, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, Laura M.E.
dc.contributor.authorSirami, Clélia
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorHoyer, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSchleyer, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLakner, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T11:44:51Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T11:44:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractEcological Focus Areas (EFAs) are one of the three new greening measures of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). We used an interdisciplinary and European-scale approach to evaluate ecological effectiveness and farmers’ perception of the different EFA options. We assessed potential benefits of EFA options for biodiversity using a survey among 88 ecologists from 17 European countries. We further analyzed data on EFA uptake at the EU level and in eight EU Member States, and reviewed socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ decisions. We then identified possible ways to improve EFAs. Ecologists scored field margins, buffer strips, fallow land, and landscape features as most beneficial whereas farmers mostly implemented “catch crops and green cover,” nitrogen-fixing crops, and fallow land. Based on the expert inputs and a review of the factors influencing farmers’ decisions, we suggest that EFA implementation could be improved by (a) prioritizing EFA options that promote biodiversity (e.g., reducing the weight or even excluding ineffective options); (b) reducing administrative constraints; (c) setting stricter management requirements (e.g., limiting agrochemical use); and (d) offering further incentives for expanding options like landscape features and buffer strips. We finally propose further improvements at the next CAP reform, to improve ecological effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/conl.12333
dc.identifier.purlhttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14928
dc.identifier.urihttps://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59112
dc.item.fulltextWith Fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.notes.internMerged from goescholar
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308454/EU//EU BON
dc.relation.issn1755-263X
dc.relation.orgunitFakultät für Agrarwissenschaften
dc.relation.orgunitDepartment für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften
dc.relation.orgunitAbteilung Agrarökologie
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleAdding Some Green to the Greening: Improving the EU's Ecological Focus Areas for Biodiversity and Farmers
dc.typejournal_article
dc.type.internalPublicationyes
dc.type.versionpublished_version
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pe'er_et_al-2017-Conservation_Letters.pdf
Size:
450.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections