Publication: Something we need to discuss - advance directives as communicative devices
| dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage | 191 | |
| dc.bibliographiccitation.issue | 3 | |
| dc.bibliographiccitation.journal | Ethik in der Medizin | |
| dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage | 200 | |
| dc.bibliographiccitation.volume | 20 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anselm, Reiner | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-07T11:11:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-07T11:11:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Definition of the problem In the current discussion on advance health care directives, questions of scope and obligation prevail. This corresponds to the main actors of the discourse: jurists and physicians. Arguments However, according to the results of a study on 272 tumor patients, this focus does not cover the patients' point of view: In their perspective, advance health care directives act as devices for communication rather than as legal directives. Conclusion Due to this perception, questions of scope and obligation are secondary. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00481-008-0574-2 | |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000259565900004 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/53394 | |
| dc.notes.status | zu prüfen | |
| dc.notes.submitter | Najko | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.issn | 0935-7335 | |
| dc.title | Something we need to discuss - advance directives as communicative devices | |
| dc.type | journal_article | |
| dc.type.internalPublication | yes | |
| dc.type.peerReviewed | yes | |
| dc.type.status | published | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |