Browsing by Author "Lechte, Clemens"

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bond strength between eroded and sound permanent enamel and dentin and to assess whether bonding performance (immediate and after aging) differs between etch&rinse and self-etch adhesives and can be improved by surface pretreatment prior to bonding. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, LILACS, BBO) were searched by two reviewers. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to compare bond strength to sound and eroded dental hard tissues without and with surface pretreatment prior to bonding, respectively. The effect of adhesive mode (etch&rinse vs. self-etch) and aging (immediate vs. aged) was compared using subgroup analyses. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I2-statistic. Funnel plots and Egger’s regression intercept tests were used to evaluate publication bias. Quality and risk of bias of included studies were also assessed. Results: Fourty-seven studies (45 in vitro, 2 in situ) were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses. Erosion impairs bond strength to dentin (p < 0.001; mean difference: −10.2 MPa [95%CI: −11.9 to −8.6 MPa]), but not to enamel (p = 0.260). Surface pretreatment measures removing or stabilizing the collagenous matrix can improve dentin bond strength (maximum mean difference: +12.4 MPa). Etch&rinse and self-etch adhesives did not perform significantly different on eroded enamel (p = 0.208) and dentin (p = 0.353). The majority of studies (32 of 47) presented a medium risk of bias. Significance: Data from in vitro and in situ studies showed that erosion impairs dentin bonding of etch&rinse and self-etch adhesives and makes surface pretreatment prior to bonding of composite restorations necessary.

Statement of problem: Less-experienced operators have been shown to require additional training to achieve results similar to those of experienced operators. However, clinical data comparing the survival and success of ceramic restorations by experienced and less-experienced operators by using the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze and compare the clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations fabricated by less-experienced (predoctoral dental students) and experienced (dentists) operators. Material and methods: Patients who received an adhesively luted CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restoration between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. Clinical performance was assessed by calibrated examiners by using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Success and survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically compared by log-rank tests and univariate Cox regression analyses. FDI criteria were compared by using Mann-Whitney-U tests (α=.05). Results: Ninety-two restorations (students: n=65, dentists: n=27) were assessed (mean ±standard deviation time from insertion: 4.04 ±1.55 years). The survival rates after 2 years (students: 93.8%, mean annual failure rate [mAFR]: 3.1%; dentist: 96.3%, mAFR: 1.9%) and after 4 years (students: 87.3%, mAFR: 3.3%; dentists: 88.3%, mAFR: 3.1%) were not significantly different (P=.525). Also, success rates after 2 (students: 90.8%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 92.6%, mAFR: 3.8%) and 4 years (students: 82.4%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 76.1%, mAFR: 6.6%) were not significantly different (P=.778). FDI criteria were also not significantly different between less-experienced and experienced operators (P≥.110). Conclusions: Operator experience did not affect the short-term clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations.

This study analyzed the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of an etch-and-rinse (ER) or a self-etch (SE) adhesive incorporated with multifunctional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (MA-POSS-8). An ER adhesive (Solobond Plus, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) and a universal adhesive applied in SE mode (Scotchbond Universal, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) were infiltrated with MA-POSS-8 (Hybrid Plastics Inc., Hattiesburg, MS, USA) at 5 wt.% or 10 wt.%. Pure adhesives served as controls. Bovine dentin specimens were conditioned with one of the adhesives prior to the application of a nano-hybrid composite (Venus Diamond A3, Kulzer, Hanau, Germany). SBS and failure modes were determined after water storage for 24 h, 6 months, 12 months, or 24 months (each subgroup n = 20). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVAs, Weibull statistics, and χ2 tests (p < 0.05). SBSs for the control groups after 24 h were 17.4 ± 4.9 MPa for the ER adhesive and 19.1 ± 5.2 MPa for the universal adhesive. After 24 months, the SBS of the ER adhesive was significantly higher for 5 wt.% MA-POSS-8 (17.9 ± 5.1 MPa) than for the control group (14.6 ± 3.6 MPa) and 10 wt.% MA-POSS-8 (12.8 ± 4.1 MPa), and more cohesive failures were observed. The SBS of the universal adhesive increased during aging, irrespective of the MA-POSS-8 concentration. 5 wt.% MA-POSS-8 improves the SBS of the ER adhesive and does not impair the SBS of the SE adhesive.

This in-vitro study aimed to analyse the effect of brushing and different brushing parameters (kind of toothpaste, kind of toothbrush, brushing force) on erosive tooth wear of primary bovine enamel and dentin. Specimens were prepared from primary bovine enamel or dentin (each group n = 12) and cyclically eroded (6 × 60 s/d, citric acid, pH 2.4) and brushed with children's toothbrushes (2 × 15 s/d) over 5 days. The brushing parameters under investigation were: toothpaste (fluoridated, fluoride-free), toothbrush (manual; rotating-oscillating and sonic, each at two different activation modes) and brushing force (1 N, 2 N). Specimens that were only eroded and not brushed served as controls. Enamel and dentin wear was quantified using widefield confocal microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed using three-and one-way ANOVAs followed by Scheffe's (enamel) or Tamhane's (dentin) post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Brushing with the fluoridated toothpaste was able to significantly reduce erosive wear in enamel (by 15 to 37%, 6 of 10 groups) and in dentin (by 58 to 72%, all groups), while brushing with the fluoride-free toothpaste was not different from the controls. Considering the kind of toothpaste and brushing force, slight differences between the toothbrushes were observed in enamel, but not in dentin. Within the same toothbrush and activation mode, almost no differences between 1 and 2 N brushing force were detected. In conclusion, erosive tooth wear on primary bovine dental hard tissue mainly depends on the kind of toothpaste, rather than on the kind of toothbrush and the brushing force.

Objectives: This systematic review attempted to assess patient acceptance of repairs instead of complete replacement for partially defective restorations and to identify factors affecting patients’ decision-making for or against repairs. Study selection: Observational and qualitative studies reporting on (1) the proportion of patients accepting or preferring repairs, (2) the proportion of dentists / dental students / dental schools stating that their patients accept or prefer repairs, (3) factors affecting patients’ decision-making for or against repairs. Sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science) were last searched in August 2024 (PROSPERO database: CRD42023449437). Data: Twenty-one sources reporting on 20 survey studies addressing individual dentists / dental students and dental schools were included. None of the included studies directly addressed patients (e.g., by interviewing patients). Of the surveyed dentists and dental students, 86.3 % (95 %-CI: 77.8–91.8 %) reported that their patients accept or prefer repairs. Dental schools rated patient acceptance as high as 93.0 % (95 %-CI: 82.3–97.4 %). None of the included studies reported factors affecting patients’ decision-making for or against repairs. Conclusions: Repairs of partially defective restorations instead of complete replacement seem to be associated with a high level of patient acceptance as most dentists, dental students, and dental schools stated that their patients accept or even prefer repairs instead of complete replacement. Clinical significance: Within the shared decision-making process, dentists can expect their patients to accept or even prefer repairs instead of complete replacement.

Zahnmedizinische Restaurationen aller Art haben nur eine begrenzte Lebensdauer. Daher liegt der Hauptanteil zahnmedizinischer Tätigkeit in der wiederholten Behandlung von Zähnen, die bereits mit Restaurationen versorgt wurden. Der vollständige Ersatz einer partiell insuffizienten Restauration geht in den meisten Fällen mit Nachteilen wie beispielsweise längeren Behandlungszeiten, höheren Kosten und vermehrten Komplikationen einher. Als minimalinvasive Alternative bietet sich die Reparatur der bestehenden Restauration an. Je nach Restaurationsmaterial sollte eine angepasste Konditionierung der bestehenden Restauration erfolgen, um Reparaturmaßnahmen langfristig erfolgreich im Praxisalltag umzusetzen.

Objectives: To systematically assess aspects of teaching of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in permanent teeth in dental schools. Study selection: Quantitative studies reporting on dental schools' teaching regarding the placement of PCRs in permanent teeth. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed. Risk of bias was assessed based on the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE via Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched in January 2023. Data: Forty sources reporting on 34 studies having surveyed 1,286 dental schools were included. Overall, 92.7% (95%-CI: 88.2-95.5) of dental schools reported to teach PCRs. PCRs in three-surface Class II cavities are taught by 82.0% (95%-CI: 70.4-89.7). The mandatory use of liners in deep cavities is taught by 78.3% (95%-CI: 68.9-85.5), and 44.0% (95%-CI: 34.3-54.2) reported to teach bulk-fill composites. While most posterior restorations placed by students were composites (56.1%; 95%-CI: 46.0-65.8), 94.7% (95%-CI: 86.6-98.0) of dental schools (still) teach posterior amalgam restorations. The proportion of dental schools teaching PCRs in three-surface Class II cavities increased and the mean proportion of PCRs among all posterior restorations increased over time (padj.≤0.003). Conclusions: The teaching of PCRs in dental schools around the world reflects the increased use of resin composite in clinical practice, with students in countries where dental amalgam continues to be used, placing more posterior composites than restorations of dental amalgam. The teaching of PCRs, which is anticipated to increase, will continue to be refined with further developments in adhesive materials, devices, instrumentation, and techniques. Clinical significance: Graduating dentists can be expected to be familiar with the use of resin composites for the restoration of posterior teeth.