Browsing by Author "Groppo, Milton"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settingsA new subfamily classification of the Citrus family (Rutaceae) based on six nuclear and plastid markers(2021)
; ;Bayly, Michael J. ;Heslewood, Margaret M. ;Groppo, Milton ;Verboom, G. Anthony ;Forster, Paul I. ;Kallunki, Jacquelyn A. ;Duretto, Marco F. ;Bayly, Michael J.; 3 School of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3010 Australia ;Heslewood, Margaret M.; 4 National Herbarium of New South Wales Australian Institute of Botanical Science, Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney NSW 2000 Australia ;Groppo, Milton; 5 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo Av. Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14051‐901, Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brazil ;Verboom, G. Anthony; 6 Bolus Herbarium, Botany Department University of Cape Town Private Bag X3, Rondebosch Cape Town South Africa 7701 ;Forster, Paul I.; 7 Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot‐tha Road, Toowong Queensland 4066 Australia ;Kallunki, Jacquelyn A.; 8 The Steere Herbarium The New York Botanical Garden Bronx New York 10458‐5126 U.S.A.Duretto, Marco F.; 4 National Herbarium of New South Wales Australian Institute of Botanical Science, Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney NSW 2000 AustraliaAbstract Rutaceae is a family of angiosperms well known for the economically important genus Citrus. The division of Rutaceae into subfamilies is still inadequate and provisional. Previous phylogenetic studies at the family level are characterized by a limited sampling of genera and lack several crucial taxa. Here, we present a phylogenetic study based on six nuclear and plastid markers including 87.7% of the currently accepted genera, which is more than twice as many as in previous studies. Seven genera are included in a phylogenetic analysis for the first time. Most clades are resolved with high support, and we propose a new subfamily classification for Rutaceae that comprises the subfamilies Amyridoideae, Aurantioideae, Cneoroideae, Haplophylloideae, Rutoideae and Zanthoxyloideae. Aurantioideae is the only traditional subfamily that is resolved as monophyletic. We tested whether 13 morphological and karyological characters are taxonomically informative in Rutaceae. Chromosome numbers are clearly different in the two main clades of Rutaceae, but fruit characteristics, which have been used to define subfamilies in the past, do not distinguish between the main lineages of the family. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settingsPhylogenomic analyses of Sapindales support new family relationships, rapid Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse diversification, and heterogeneous histories of gene duplication(2023-03-07)
;Joyce, Elizabeth M.; ;Buerki, Sven ;Cheek, Martin ;de Vos, Jurriaan M. ;Pirani, José R. ;Zuntini, Alexandre R. ;Bachelier, Julien B. ;Bayly, Michael J. ;Callmander, Martin W. ;Devecchi, Marcelo F. ;Pell, Susan K. ;Groppo, Milton ;Lowry, Porter P. ;Mitchell, John ;Siniscalchi, Carolina M. ;Munzinger, Jérôme ;Orel, Harvey K. ;Pannell, Caroline M. ;Nauheimer, Lars ;Sauquet, Hervé ;Weeks, Andrea ;Muellner-Riehl, Alexandra N. ;Leitch, Ilia J. ;Maurin, Olivier ;Forest, Félix ;Nargar, Katharina ;Thiele, Kevin R. ;Baker, William J. ;Crayn, Darren M. ;Joyce, Elizabeth M.; 1 Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany ;Appelhans, Marc S.; 4 Department of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, University of Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany ;Buerki, Sven; 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States ;Cheek, Martin; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;de Vos, Jurriaan M.; 8 Department of Environmental Sciences, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland ;Pirani, José R.; 9 Departamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil ;Zuntini, Alexandre R.; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;Bachelier, Julien B.; 10 Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany ;Bayly, Michael J.; 11 School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia ;Callmander, Martin W.; 12 Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland ;Devecchi, Marcelo F.; 9 Departamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil ;Pell, Susan K.; 13 United States Botanic Garden, Washington, DC, United States ;Groppo, Milton; 9 Departamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil ;Lowry, Porter P.; 14 Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, United States ;Mitchell, John; 16 New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY, United States ;Siniscalchi, Carolina M.; 17 Department of Biological Sciences, Harned Hall, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States ;Munzinger, Jérôme; 18 AMAP, Université Montpellier, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRAE), Montpellier, France ;Orel, Harvey K.; 11 School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia ;Pannell, Caroline M.; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;Nauheimer, Lars; 2 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia ;Sauquet, Hervé; 21 National Herbarium of New South Wales (NSW), Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW, Australia ;Weeks, Andrea; 22 Department of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States ;Muellner-Riehl, Alexandra N.; 23 Department of Molecular Evolution and Plant Systematics & Herbarium, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany ;Leitch, Ilia J.; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;Maurin, Olivier; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;Forest, Félix; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom ;Nargar, Katharina; 3 Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia ;Thiele, Kevin R.; 26 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia ;Baker, William J.; 7 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United KingdomCrayn, Darren M.; 2 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, AustraliaSapindales is an angiosperm order of high economic and ecological value comprising nine families, c. 479 genera, and c. 6570 species. However, family and subfamily relationships in Sapindales remain unclear, making reconstruction of the order’s spatio-temporal and morphological evolution difficult. In this study, we used Angiosperms353 target capture data to generate the most densely sampled phylogenetic trees of Sapindales to date, with 448 samples and c. 85% of genera represented. The percentage of paralogous loci and allele divergence was characterized across the phylogeny, which was time-calibrated using 29 rigorously assessed fossil calibrations. All families were supported as monophyletic. Two core family clades subdivide the order, the first comprising Kirkiaceae, Burseraceae, and Anacardiaceae, the second comprising Simaroubaceae, Meliaceae, and Rutaceae. Kirkiaceae is sister to Burseraceae and Anacardiaceae, and, contrary to current understanding, Simaroubaceae is sister to Meliaceae and Rutaceae. Sapindaceae is placed with Nitrariaceae and Biebersteiniaceae as sister to the core Sapindales families, but the relationships between these families remain unclear, likely due to their rapid and ancient diversification. Sapindales families emerged in rapid succession, coincident with the climatic change of the Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse event. Subfamily and tribal relationships within the major families need revision, particularly in Sapindaceae, Rutaceae and Meliaceae. Much of the difficulty in reconstructing relationships at this level may be caused by the prevalence of paralogous loci, particularly in Meliaceae and Rutaceae, that are likely indicative of ancient gene duplication events such as hybridization and polyploidization playing a role in the evolutionary history of these families. This study provides key insights into factors that may affect phylogenetic reconstructions in Sapindales across multiple scales, and provides a state-of-the-art phylogenetic framework for further research. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settingsPhylogeny and biogeography of the pantropical genus Zanthoxylum and its closest relatives in the proto-Rutaceae group (Rutaceae)(2018)
; ;Reichelt, Niklas ;Groppo, Milton ;Paetzold, ClaudiaWen, Jun