Browsing by Author "Bertz, Hartmut"

Introduction According to international literature, patients with cancer wish to have information on complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH). Medical guidelines recommend actively approaching patients with cancer discussing potential benefits and risks of individual CIH methods. While some CIH methods, for example, acupuncture and yoga, have been proven effective in high-quality studies, other CIH methods lack studies or bear the risk of interactions with chemotherapeutics, for example, herbal drugs. Therefore, an evidence-based interprofessional counselling programme on CIH will be implemented at four Comprehensive Cancer Centres in the federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Methods and analysis A complex intervention consisting of elements on patient, provider and system levels will be developed and evaluated within a multilayer evaluation design with confirmatory evaluation on patient level. Patients with a cancer diagnosis within the last 6 months will receive three individual counselling sessions on CIH within 3 months (=intervention on patient level). The counselling will be provided by an interprofessional team of medical and nursing staff. For this purpose, an intensive online training programme, a CIH knowledge database and an interprofessional team-building process were developed and implemented (=intervention on provider level). Moreover, training events on the basics of CIH are offered in the outpatient setting (=intervention on system level). Primary outcome of the evaluation at the patient level is patient activation measured (PAM) with the PAM-13 after 3 months. Secondary outcomes, for example, quality of life, self-efficacy and clinical parameters, will be assessed at baseline, after 3 months and at 6 months follow-up. The intervention group (n=1000) will be compared with a control group (n=500, treatment as usual, no CIH counselling. The outcomes and follow-up times in the control group are the same as in the intervention group. Moreover, the use of health services will be analysed in both groups using routine data. A qualitative-quantitative process evaluation as well as a health economic evaluation will identify relevant barriers and enabling factors for later roll-out. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the appropriate Institutional Ethical Committee of the University of Tuebingen, No. 658/2019BO1. The results of these studies will be disseminated to academic audiences and in the community. Trial registration number DRKS00021779; Pre-results.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Donor T-cells cause inflammation and tissue damage in GvHD target organs such as liver, gut and skin. Cytokine receptor associated kinases JAK1 and JAK2 are critical for inflammatory cytokine response in GvHD. Ruxolitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2. Preliminary data indicated substantial clinical activity in patients with steroid-refractory (SR) acute and chronic GvHD. METHODS: The RIG-study is an investigator-initiated open-label, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled two-arm phase 2 study, comparing the efficacy of ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute GvHD (SR-aGvHD). Patients with acute skin, intestinal or liver GvHD > grade 1 and failure of previous treatment are eligible. The trial aims to include 160 patients who will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by GvHD grade (≤ grade 3 versus grade 4) and number of previous immunosuppressive treatments (≤ 3 versus ≥4). The primary endpoint is the overall response rate at day 28, defined as: Improvement of at least one stage in the severity of acute GvHD in one organ without deterioration in any other organ, or disappearance of any GvHD signs from all organs without requirement for new systemic immunosuppressive treatment. Secondary objectives include time to response, overall survival, event-free survival, non-relapse mortality (NRM), failure-free survival, graft failure rates, quality of life and changes in serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and GvHD-related biomarkers. DISCUSSION: This randomized prospective trial will provide further evidence if the retrospectively collected data demonstrating activity of ruxolitinib for SR-aGvHD can be reproduced. A major advantage of ruxolitinib might be the limited and predictable toxicity profile compared to other immunosuppressive therapies that mainly includes viral reactivation and cytopenias. This trial will establish candidate biomarkers to predict and monitor responses to ruxolitinib. As a next step ruxolitinib might be tested upfront against steroids or in a preemptive manner to prevent GvHD to occur.