Repository logoRepository logo
GRO
  • GRO.data
  • GRO.plan
Help
  • English
  • Deutsch
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Publications
Researcher
Organizations
Other
  • Journals
  • Series
  • Events
  • Projects
  • Working Groups

Browsing by Author "Beltramello, Alberto"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Amygdalar nuclei and hippocampal subfields on MRI: Test‐retest reliability of automated segmentation in old and young healthy volunteers
    (2020)
    Quattrini, Giulia
    ;
    Pievani, Michela
    ;
    Jovicich, Jorge
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Bargalló, Nuria
    ;
    Barkhof, Frederik
    ;
    Bartrés‐Faz, David
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Pizzini, Francesca B
    ;
    Blin, Olivier
    ;
    Consortium, PharmaCog
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Amygdalar nuclei and hippocampal subfields on MRI: Test-retest reliability of automated volumetry across different MRI sites and vendors
    (2020)
    Quattrini, Giulia
    ;
    Pievani, Michela
    ;
    Jovicich, Jorge
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Bargalló, Núria
    ;
    Barkhof, Frederik
    ;
    Bartres-Faz, David
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Pizzini, Francesca B.
    ;
    Marizzoni, Moira
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Free water elimination improves test-retest reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging indices in the brain: A longitudinal multisite study of healthy elderly subjects
    (2016)
    Albi, Angela
    ;
    Pasternak, Ofer
    ;
    Minati, Ludovico
    ;
    Marizzoni, Moira
    ;
    Bartrés-Faz, David
    ;
    Bargalló, Núria
    ;
    Bosch, Beatriz
    ;
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    ;
    Marra, Camillo
    ;
    Müller, Bernhard W.
    ;
    Fiedler, Ute
    ;
    Wiltfang, Jens  
    ;
    Roccatagliata, Luca
    ;
    Picco, Agnese
    ;
    Nobili, Flavio Mariano
    ;
    Blin, Oliver
    ;
    Sein, Julien
    ;
    Ranjeva, Jean-Philippe
    ;
    Didic, Mira
    ;
    Bombois, Stephanie
    ;
    Lopes, Renaud
    ;
    Bordet, Régis
    ;
    Gros-Dagnac, Hélène
    ;
    Payoux, Pierre
    ;
    Zoccatelli, Giada
    ;
    Alessandrini, Franco
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Ferretti, Antonio
    ;
    Caulo, Massimo
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    ;
    Soricelli, Andrea
    ;
    Parnetti, Lucilla
    ;
    Tarducci, Roberto
    ;
    Floridi, Piero
    ;
    Tsolaki, Magda
    ;
    Constantinidis, Manos
    ;
    Drevelegas, Antonios
    ;
    Frisoni, Giovanni B.
    ;
    Jovicich, Jorge
    Free water elimination (FWE) in brain diffusion MRI has been shown to improve tissue specificity in human white matter characterization both in health and in disease. Relative to the classical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) model, FWE is also expected to increase sensitivity to microstructural changes in longitudinal studies. However, it is not clear if these two models differ in their test–retest reproducibility. This study compares a bi-tensor model for FWE with DTI by extending a previous longitudinal-reproducibility 3T multisite study (10 sites, 7 different scanner models) of 50 healthy elderly participants (55–80 years old) scanned in two sessions at least 1 week apart. We computed the reproducibility of commonly used DTI metrics (FA: fractional anisotropy, MD: mean diffusivity, RD: radial diffusivity, and AXD: axial diffusivity), derived either using a DTI model or a FWE model. The DTI metrics were evaluated over 48 white-matter regions of the JHU-ICBM-DTI-81 white-matter labels atlas, and reproducibility errors were assessed. We found that relative to the DTI model, FWE significantly reduced reproducibility errors in most areas tested. In particular, for the FA and MD metrics, there was an average reduction of approximately 1% in the reproducibility error. The reproducibility scores did not significantly differ across sites. This study shows that FWE improves sensitivity and is thus promising for clinical applications, with the potential to identify more subtle changes. The increased reproducibility allows for smaller sample size or shorter trials in studies evaluating biomarkers of disease progression or treatment effects.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Longitudinal reproducibility of automatically segmented hippocampal subfields: A multisite European 3T study on healthy elderly
    (2015)
    Marizzoni, Moira
    ;
    Antelmi, Luigi
    ;
    Bosch, Beatriz
    ;
    Bartrés-Faz, David
    ;
    Müller, Bernhard W.
    ;
    Wiltfang, Jens  
    ;
    Fiedler, Ute
    ;
    Roccatagliata, Luca
    ;
    Picco, Agnese
    ;
    Nobili, Flavio
    ;
    Blin, Olivier
    ;
    Bombois, Stephanie
    ;
    Lopes, Renaud
    ;
    Sein, Julien
    ;
    Ranjeva, Jean-Philippe
    ;
    Didic, Mira
    ;
    Gros-Dagnac, Hélène
    ;
    Payoux, Pierre
    ;
    Zoccatelli, Giada
    ;
    Alessandrini, Franco
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Bargalló, Núria
    ;
    Ferretti, Antonio
    ;
    Caulo, Massimo
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    ;
    Soricelli, Andrea
    ;
    Salvadori, Nicola
    ;
    Parnetti, Lucilla
    ;
    Tarducci, Roberto
    ;
    Floridi, Piero
    ;
    Tsolaki, Magda
    ;
    Constantinidis, Manos
    ;
    Drevelegas, Antonios
    ;
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    ;
    Marra, Camillo
    ;
    Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
    ;
    Hensch, Tilman
    ;
    Schönknecht, Peter
    ;
    Kuijer, Joost P.
    ;
    Visser, Pieter Jelle
    ;
    Barkhof, Frederik
    ;
    Bordet, Régis
    ;
    Frisoni, Giovanni B.
    ;
    Jovicich, Jorge
    Recently, there has been an increased interest in the use of automatically segmented subfields of the human hippocampal formation derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, little is known about the test-retest reproducibility of such measures, particularly in the context of multisite studies. Here, we report the reproducibility of automated Freesurfer hippocampal subfields segmentations in 65 healthy elderly enrolled in a consortium of 13 3T MRI sites (five subjects per site). Participants were scanned in two sessions (test and retest) at least one week apart. Each session included two anatomical 3D T1 MRI acquisitions harmonized in the consortium. We evaluated the test-retest reproducibility of subfields segmentation (i) to assess the effects of averaging two within-session T1 images and (ii) to compare subfields with whole hippocampus volume and spatial reliability. We found that within-session averaging of two T1 images significantly improved the reproducibility of all hippocampal subfields but not that of the whole hippocampus. Volumetric and spatial reproducibility across MRI sites were very good for the whole hippocampus, CA2-3, CA4-dentate gyrus (DG), subiculum (reproducibility error∼2% and DICE > 0.90), good for CA1 and presubiculum (reproducibility error ∼ 5% and DICE ∼ 0.90), and poorer for fimbria and hippocampal fissure (reproducibility error ∼ 15% and DICE < 0.80). Spearman's correlations confirmed that test-retest reproducibility improved with volume size. Despite considerable differences of MRI scanner configurations, we found consistent hippocampal subfields volumes estimation. CA2-3, CA4-DG, and sub-CA1 (subiculum, presubiculum, and CA1 pooled together) gave test-retest reproducibility similar to the whole hippocampus. Our findings suggest that the larger hippocampal subfields volume may be reliable longitudinal markers in multisite studies
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects
    (2014)
    Jovicich, Jorge
    ;
    Marizzoni, Moira
    ;
    Bosch, Beatriz
    ;
    Bartrés-Faz, David
    ;
    Arnold, Jennifer
    ;
    Benninghoff, Jens
    ;
    Wiltfang, Jens  
    ;
    Roccatagliata, Luca
    ;
    Picco, Agnese
    ;
    Nobili, Flavio
    ;
    Blin, Oliver
    ;
    Bombois, Stephanie
    ;
    Lopes, Renaud
    ;
    Bordet, Régis
    ;
    Chanoine, Valérie
    ;
    Ranjeva, Jean-Philippe
    ;
    Didic, Mira
    ;
    Gros-Dagnac, Hélène
    ;
    Payoux, Pierre
    ;
    Zoccatelli, Giada
    ;
    Alessandrini, Franco
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Bargalló, Núria
    ;
    Ferretti, Antonio
    ;
    Caulo, Massimo
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Ragucci, Monica
    ;
    Soricelli, Andrea
    ;
    Salvadori, Nicola
    ;
    Tarducci, Roberto
    ;
    Floridi, Piero
    ;
    Tsolaki, Magda
    ;
    Constantinidis, Manos
    ;
    Drevelegas, Antonios
    ;
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    ;
    Marra, Camillo
    ;
    Otto, Josephin
    ;
    Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin
    ;
    Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
    ;
    Galluzzi, Samantha
    ;
    Frisoni, Giovanni B.
    Large-scale longitudinal neuroimaging studies with diffusion imaging techniques are necessary to test and validate models of white matter neurophysiological processes that change in time, both in healthy and diseased brains. The predictive power of such longitudinal models will always be limited by the reproducibility of repeated measures acquired during different sessions. At present, there is limited quantitative knowledge about the across-session reproducibility of standard diffusion metrics in 3 T multi-centric studies on subjects in stable conditions, in particular when using tract based spatial statistics and with elderly people. In this study we implemented a multi-site brain diffusion protocol in 10 clinical 3 T MRI sites distributed across 4 countries in Europe (Italy, Germany, France and Greece) using vendor provided sequences from Siemens (Allegra, Trio Tim, Verio, Skyra, Biograph mMR), Philips (Achieva) and GE (HDxt) scanners. We acquired DTI data (2 × 2 × 2 mm3, b = 700 s/mm2, 5 b0 and 30 diffusion weighted volumes) of a group of healthy stable elderly subjects (5 subjects per site) in two separate sessions at least a week apart. For each subject and session four scalar diffusion metrics were considered: fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD) and axial (AD) diffusivity. The diffusion metrics from multiple subjects and sessions at each site were aligned to their common white matter skeleton using tract-based spatial statistics. The reproducibility at each MRI site was examined by looking at group averages of absolute changes relative to the mean (%) on various parameters: i) reproducibility of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the b0 images in centrum semiovale, ii) full brain test–retest differences of the diffusion metric maps on the white matter skeleton, iii) reproducibility of the diffusion metrics on atlas-based white matter ROIs on the white matter skeleton. Despite the differences of MRI scanner configurations across sites (vendors, models, RF coils and acquisition sequences) we found good and consistent test–retest reproducibility. White matter b0 SNR reproducibility was on average 7 ± 1% with no significant MRI site effects. Whole brain analysis resulted in no significant test–retest differences at any of the sites with any of the DTI metrics. The atlas-based ROI analysis showed that the mean reproducibility errors largely remained in the 2–4% range for FA and AD and 2–6% for MD and RD, averaged across ROIs. Our results show reproducibility values comparable to those reported in studies using a smaller number of MRI scanners, slightly different DTI protocols and mostly younger populations. We therefore show that the acquisition and analysis protocols used are appropriate for multi-site experimental scenarios.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Test-retest reliability of the default mode network in a multi-centric fMRI study of healthy elderly: Effects of data-driven physiological noise correction techniques
    (2016)
    Marchitelli, Rocco
    ;
    Minati, Ludovico
    ;
    Marizzoni, Moira
    ;
    Bosch, Beatriz
    ;
    Bartrés-Faz, David
    ;
    Müller, Bernhard W.
    ;
    Wiltfang, Jens  
    ;
    Fiedler, Ute
    ;
    Roccatagliata, Luca
    ;
    Picco, Agnese
    ;
    Nobili, Flavio
    ;
    Blin, Oliver
    ;
    Bombois, Stephanie
    ;
    Lopes, Renaud
    ;
    Bordet, Régis
    ;
    Sein, Julien
    ;
    Ranjeva, Jean-Philippe
    ;
    Didic, Mira
    ;
    Gros-Dagnac, Hélène
    ;
    Payoux, Pierre
    ;
    Zoccatelli, Giada
    ;
    Alessandrini, Franco
    ;
    Beltramello, Alberto
    ;
    Bargalló, Núria
    ;
    Ferretti, Antonio
    ;
    Caulo, Massimo
    ;
    Aiello, Marco
    ;
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    ;
    Soricelli, Andrea
    ;
    Parnetti, Lucilla
    ;
    Tarducci, Roberto
    ;
    Floridi, Piero
    ;
    Tsolaki, Magda
    ;
    Constantinidis, Manos
    ;
    Drevelegas, Antonios
    ;
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    ;
    Marra, Camillo
    ;
    Schönknecht, Peter
    ;
    Hensch, Tilman
    ;
    Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
    ;
    Kuijer, Joost P.
    ;
    Visser, Pieter Jelle
    ;
    Barkhof, Frederik
    ;
    Frisoni, Giovanni B.
    ;
    Jovicich, Jorge
    Understanding how to reduce the influence of physiological noise in resting state fMRI data is important for the interpretation of functional brain connectivity. Limited data is currently available to assess the performance of physiological noise correction techniques, in particular when evaluating longitudinal changes in the default mode network (DMN) of healthy elderly participants. In this 3T harmonized multisite fMRI study, we investigated how different retrospective physiological noise correction (rPNC) methods influence the within-site test-retest reliability and the across-site reproducibility consistency of DMN-derived measurements across 13 MRI sites. Elderly participants were scanned twice at least a week apart (five participants per site). The rPNC methods were: none (NPC), Tissue-based regression, PESTICA and FSL-FIX. The DMN at the single subject level was robustly identified using ICA methods in all rPNC conditions. The methods significantly affected the mean z-scores and, albeit less markedly, the cluster-size in the DMN; in particular, FSL-FIX tended to increase the DMN z-scores compared to others. Within-site test-retest reliability was consistent across sites, with no differences across rPNC methods. The absolute percent errors were in the range of 5–11% for DMN z-scores and cluster-size reliability. DMN pattern overlap was in the range 60–65%. In particular, no rPNC method showed a significant reliability improvement relative to NPC. However, FSL-FIX and Tissue-based physiological correction methods showed both similar and significant improvements of reproducibility consistency across the consortium (ICC = 0.67) for the DMN z-scores relative to NPC. Overall these findings support the use of rPNC methods like tissue-based or FSL-FIX to characterize multisite longitudinal changes of intrinsic functional connectivity.

About

About Us
FAQ
ORCID
End User Agreement
Privacy policy
Cookie consent
Imprint

Contact

Team GRO.publications
support-gro.publications@uni-goettingen.de
Matrix Chat: #support_gro_publications
Feedback

Göttingen Research Online

Göttingen Research Online bundles various services for Göttingen researchers:

GRO.data (research data repository)
GRO.plan (data management planning)
GRO.publications (publication data repository)
Logo Uni Göttingen
Logo Campus Göttingen
Logo SUB Göttingen
Logo eResearch Alliance

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.