Browsing by Author "Altman, Jan"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settingsSpecies- and compound-specific dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates toward the world’s upper distribution of vascular plants(2022)
;Chlumská, Zuzana ;Liancourt, Pierre; ;Bartoš, Michael ;Altman, Jan ;Dvorský, Miroslav ;Hubáček, Tomáš ;Borovec, Jakub ;Čapková, Kateřina ;Kotilínek, MilanDoležal, Jiří - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settingsTraits of dominant plant species drive normalized difference vegetation index in grasslands globally(2023-02-22)
;Engel, Thore ;Bruelheide, Helge ;Hoss, Daniela ;Sabatini, Francesco M. ;Altman, Jan ;Arfin‐Khan, Mohammed A. S.; ;Černý, Tomáš ;Chytrý, Milan ;Dainese, Matteo ;Dengler, Jürgen ;Dolezal, Jiri ;Field, Richard ;Fischer, Felícia M. ;Huygens, Dries ;Jandt, Ute ;Jansen, Florian ;Jentsch, Anke ;Karger, Dirk N. ;Kattge, Jens ;Lenoir, Jonathan ;Lens, Frederic ;Loos, Jaqueline ;Niinemets, Ülo ;Overbeck, Gerhard E. ;Ozinga, Wim A. ;Penuelas, Josep ;Peyre, Gwendolyn ;Phillips, Oliver ;Reich, Peter B. ;Römermann, Christine ;Sandel, Brody ;Schmidt, Marco ;Schrodt, Franziska ;Velez‐Martin, Eduardo ;Violle, Cyrille ;Pillar, Valério ;Bruelheide, Helge; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Hoss, Daniela; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Sabatini, Francesco M.; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Altman, Jan; 9 Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany Průhonice Czech Republic ;Arfin‐Khan, Mohammed A. S.; 11 Department of Forestry and Environmental Science Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet Bangladesh ;Bergmeier, Erwin; 12 Vegetation and Phytodiversity Analysis University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany ;Černý, Tomáš; 10 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Science, Department of Forest Ecology Czech University of Life Sciences Suchdol Czech Republic ;Chytrý, Milan; 13 Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic ;Dainese, Matteo; 14 Eurac Research, Institute for Alpine Environment Bozen/Bolzano Italy ;Dengler, Jürgen; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Dolezal, Jiri; 17 Department of Functional Ecology Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences Trebon Czech Republic ;Field, Richard; 19 School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham UK ;Fischer, Felícia M.; 20 Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CSIC‐UV‐GV) Valencia Spain ;Huygens, Dries; 21 Isotope Bioscience Laboratory Ghent University Ghent Belgium ;Jandt, Ute; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Jansen, Florian; 22 Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Rostock Rostock Germany ;Jentsch, Anke; 23 Disturbance Ecology University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany ;Karger, Dirk N.; 24 Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland ;Kattge, Jens; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Lenoir, Jonathan; 26 UMR CNRS 7058, Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN) Université de Picardie Jules Verne Amiens France ;Lens, Frederic; 27 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Functional Traits Leiden The Netherlands ;Loos, Jaqueline; 29 Institute of Ecology Leuphana University Lüneburg Germany ;Niinemets, Ülo; 30 Crop Science and Plant Biology Estonian University of Life Sciences Tartu Estonia ;Overbeck, Gerhard E.; 32 Department of Botany Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil ;Ozinga, Wim A.; 33 Team Vegetation, Forest and Landscape Ecology Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands ;Penuelas, Josep; 34 CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF‐CSIC‐UAB Bellaterra Spain ;Peyre, Gwendolyn; 36 Civil and Environmental Engineering University of the Andes Bogotá Colombia ;Phillips, Oliver; 37 School of Geography University of Leeds Leeds UK ;Reich, Peter B.; 38 Forest Resources University of Minnesota Minnesota St. Paul USA ;Römermann, Christine; 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany ;Sandel, Brody; 42 Department of Biology Santa Clara University California Santa Clara USA ;Schmidt, Marco; 43 Palmengarten der Stadt Frankfurt am Main, Wissenschaftlicher Dienst Frankfurt am Main Germany ;Schrodt, Franziska; 19 School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham UK ;Velez‐Martin, Eduardo; 5 Department of Ecology Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil ;Violle, Cyrille; 44 CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Campus du CNRS Montpellier FrancePillar, Valério; 5 Department of Ecology Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul BrazilAbstract Aim Theoretical, experimental and observational studies have shown that biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships are influenced by functional community structure through two mutually non‐exclusive mechanisms: (1) the dominance effect (which relates to the traits of the dominant species); and (2) the niche partitioning effect [which relates to functional diversity (FD)]. Although both mechanisms have been studied in plant communities and experiments at small spatial extents, it remains unclear whether evidence from small‐extent case studies translates into a generalizable macroecological pattern. Here, we evaluate dominance and niche partitioning effects simultaneously in grassland systems world‐wide. Location Two thousand nine hundred and forty‐one grassland plots globally. Time period 2000–2014. Major taxa studied Vascular plants. Methods We obtained plot‐based data on functional community structure from the global vegetation plot database “sPlot”, which combines species composition with plant trait data from the “TRY” database. We used data on the community‐weighted mean (CWM) and FD for 18 ecologically relevant plant traits. As an indicator of primary productivity, we extracted the satellite‐derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from MODIS. Using generalized additive models and deviation partitioning, we estimated the contributions of trait CWM and FD to the variation in annual maximum NDVI, while controlling for climatic variables and spatial structure. Results Grassland communities dominated by relatively tall species with acquisitive traits had higher NDVI values, suggesting the prevalence of dominance effects for BEF relationships. We found no support for niche partitioning for the functional traits analysed, because NDVI remained unaffected by FD. Most of the predictive power of traits was shared by climatic predictors and spatial coordinates. This highlights the importance of community assembly processes for BEF relationships in natural communities. Main conclusions Our analysis provides empirical evidence that plant functional community structure and global patterns in primary productivity are linked through the resource economics and size traits of the dominant species. This is an important test of the hypotheses underlying BEF relationships at the global scale.