Repository logoRepository logo
GRO
  • GRO.data
  • GRO.plan
Help
  • English
  • Deutsch
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Publications
Researcher
Organizations
Other
  • Journals
  • Series
  • Events
  • Projects
  • Working Groups

Browsing by Author "Altermann, W."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools.
    (2013)
    Schlaf, G.
    ;
    Pollok-Kopp, B.
    ;
    Schabel, E.
    ;
    Altermann, W.
    Allografting patients with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) which are recognized by preformed antibodies constitutes the main cause for hyper-acute or acute rejections. In order to select recipients without these donor-specific antibodies, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) assay was developed as a standard procedure about forty years ago. The negative outcome of pretransplant crossmatching represents the most important requirement for a successful kidney graft survival. The artificially positive outcomes of CDC-based crossmatches due to the underlying disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), however, may lead to the unjustified refusal of adequate kidney grafts. Two prospective female recipients destined for a living as well as for a cadaver kidney donation, respectively, exhibited positive CDC-based crossmatch outcomes although for both patients no historical immunizing events were known. Furthermore, solid phase-based screening or antibody differentiation analyses never led to positive results. Immediate reruns of the CDC-based crossmatch assays using the alternative antibody monitoring system (AMS-)crossmatch ELISA resulted in unequivocally negative outcomes. Consequently both transplantations were performed without any immunological complications for the hitherto follow-up time of 25 and 28 months, respectively. We here show two case reports demonstrating an alternative methodical approach to circumvent CDC-based artefacts and point to the urgent need to substitute the CDC-based crossmatch procedure at least for special groups of patients.

About

About Us
FAQ
ORCID
End User Agreement
Privacy policy
Cookie consent
Imprint

Contact

Team GRO.publications
support-gro.publications@uni-goettingen.de
Matrix Chat: #support_gro_publications
Feedback

Göttingen Research Online

Göttingen Research Online bundles various services for Göttingen researchers:

GRO.data (research data repository)
GRO.plan (data management planning)
GRO.publications (publication data repository)
Logo Uni Göttingen
Logo Campus Göttingen
Logo SUB Göttingen
Logo eResearch Alliance

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.